Proofs that Moon Landings Were Faked
July 16, 1969: 60...50..40...30...20...10...It was the countdown time for Apollo 11. For the
first time in history, a mission was made to take mankind boast his ability; to
reach our nearest celestial, the moon. Consequently, it stood as the greatest
government controversy in the history of the humankind. Why is it so?
Let us date back to the times of cold war. There was a prodigious competition between US and USSR, in all aspects. By 1960's, Yuri Gagarin (USSR) accomplished a great feat of being the first person in space. Years later, in 1957, Soviet Union was able to launch Sputnik 1 successfully into the space and later, Laika (dog) was sent by Sputnik 2 to the moon. In this way, USSR excelled US in space technology. This was a great stain on its pride. Later in 1969 July 16, US marked a miraculous triumph by sending man to the moon. After several investigations, there are critics everywhere that it was faked. It is noteworthy that James E. Webb, the top official of NASA resigned just a week before the accomplishment. Why would anyone do that at the verge of remarkable success? Why did Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edward Aldrin resigned just after their return from moon? And also, there are rumors that the murder of 3 astronauts of NASA Grissom, White and Chaffee are somehow related to this (Critics say that they were murdered for the fear of revealing the truths behind Apollo 11).
Here are the proofs that the moon landing was faked.
1. The Wavering Flag
The image clearly shows that the flag planted by Neil Armstrong
and Buzz Aldrin is rippling in breeze where it is not supposed to as moon
doesn't have any atmosphere.
NASA gives explanation that the flag is waving just due to inertia
of the impact of planting. And also as the astronauts unfurled the flag from a
thin tube, there were ripples, they said.
2. Van Allen Radiation Belt
At a 1000 miles above the surface of the Earth and extending
25,000 miles furthermore, there exists a thick belt of radiation popularly
called as Van Allen radiation belt. The same stands as the major problem for
human journey to moon. Inorder to be protected from such heavy radiation, the
space vehicle must be coated with tons of lead. Contrarily, Apollo 11 was
coated with just an inch of Aluminium!!!
3. No Stars
One of the compelling argument for the moon hoax is that stars
couldn't be seen in any of the videos or the images. Antithetically, the
visibility of the stars should be better from moon as it contains no
clouds.
The absence of stars can be explained if an ordinary camera is
used. The surface of the moon reflects light and also Sun which makes star
light uncaptured. But, with the most advanced camera in Apollo 11, this is
highly questionable.
4. The Intersecting Shadows
"Usually, sunlight would never cast intersecting
shadows," says Ralph Rene, author of NASA mooned America. Furthermore, it
is intriguing that the astronaut shines bright in the dark shadows.
Investigations reveal that it is possible just by using artificial source of
light.
5. The Cross-hairs
An image should have cross-hairs placed at the very front of an
image. It was not so in the moon landing images. In many of the pictures taken,
they were beneath the photo. This clearly shows that the images were
duplicated, edited or doctored after that.
Some claim that NASA printed the photograph on the cross-hairs. If
it was so, why would someone leave cross-hairs behind?
6. No Human Landings After 1972
No other country except US have sent a human to moon until 50
years after 1972. US sent a group of astronomers to moon in the period of
1969-72, but stopped later. Why? It is because they realized that its nigh
impossible to send a man with that technology. What they did was to just
improving their film-making skills.
7. The C-Stone
One of the most controversial thing in images of moon landing
gag was a rock with C-mark on it. The mark is so perfect and symmetrical that
it is unlikely a natural doing. It is highly rational to think that it was
marked by the film crew. However, it is a nonplus that the mark disappeared in
the later images revealed by NASA.
8. The Controversial Walk
The video footage of moon landing shows Neil Armstrong walking
slowly on the surface of the moon. Recent investigations proved that if the
speed of the original footage is doubled, it is as same as walking on the
Earth. That means, it can be done by any commoner.
9. Lack of Lunar Crater
This stands as one of the most important evidence in proving this
hoax. Whenever a space shuttle lands on the moon, it should create a huge
impact crater as lunar dust is just similar to that of volcanic ash. Also, the
space vehicles which were launched after that, had left their lunar signatures.
It is great to know if Apollo were any exception.
From the above, the points are crystal clear that the moon landing
was manipulated. Perhaps, this might be the reason that Neil Armstrong never
gave a camera interview later. It is obvious that the moon landing was faked
just for political reasons and not for anything more.
0 comments: