Proofs that Moon Landings Were Faked - The Mystique

Proofs that Moon Landings Were Faked

, 0 Comments



July 16, 1969:   60...50..40...30...20...10...It was the countdown time for Apollo 11. For the first time in history, a mission was made to take mankind boast his ability; to reach our nearest celestial, the moon. Consequently, it stood as the greatest government controversy in the history of the humankind. Why is it so?

                 Let us date back to the times of cold war. There was a prodigious competition between US and USSR, in all aspects. By 1960's, Yuri Gagarin (USSR) accomplished a great feat of being the first person in space. Years later, in 1957, Soviet Union was able to launch Sputnik 1 successfully into the space and later, Laika (dog) was sent by Sputnik 2 to the moon. In this way, USSR excelled US in space technology. This was a great stain on its pride. Later in 1969 July 16, US marked a miraculous triumph by sending man to the moon. After several investigations, there are critics everywhere that it was faked. It is noteworthy that James E. Webb, the top official of NASA resigned just a week before the accomplishment. Why would anyone do that at the verge of remarkable success? Why did Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edward Aldrin resigned just after their return from moon? And also, there are rumors that the murder of 3 astronauts of NASA Grissom, White and Chaffee are somehow related to this (Critics say that they were murdered for the fear of revealing the truths behind Apollo 11).

Here are the proofs that the moon landing was faked.

1. The Wavering Flag

The image clearly shows that the flag planted by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin is rippling in breeze where it is not supposed to as moon doesn't have any atmosphere.
 

NASA gives explanation that the flag is waving just due to inertia of the impact of planting. And also as the astronauts unfurled the flag from a thin tube, there were ripples, they said. 

2. Van Allen Radiation Belt

At a 1000 miles above the surface of the Earth and extending 25,000 miles furthermore, there exists a thick belt of radiation popularly called as Van Allen radiation belt. The same stands as the major problem for human journey to moon. Inorder to be protected from such heavy radiation, the space vehicle must be coated with tons of lead. Contrarily, Apollo 11 was coated with just an inch of Aluminium!!!
 

3. No Stars

One of the compelling argument for the moon hoax is that stars couldn't be seen in any of the videos or the images. Antithetically, the visibility of the stars should be better from moon as it contains no clouds. 



The absence of stars can be explained if an ordinary camera is used. The surface of the moon reflects light and also Sun which makes star light uncaptured. But, with the most advanced camera in Apollo 11, this is highly questionable.

4. The Intersecting Shadows

"Usually, sunlight would never cast intersecting shadows," says Ralph Rene, author of NASA mooned America. Furthermore, it is intriguing that the astronaut shines bright in the dark shadows. Investigations reveal that it is possible just by using artificial source of light.



5. The Cross-hairs

An image should have cross-hairs placed at the very front of an image. It was not so in the moon landing images. In many of the pictures taken, they were beneath the photo. This clearly shows that the images were duplicated, edited or doctored after that.



Some claim that NASA printed the photograph on the cross-hairs. If it was so, why would someone leave cross-hairs behind?

6. No Human Landings After 1972



No other country except US have sent a human to moon until 50 years after 1972. US sent a group of astronomers to moon in the period of 1969-72, but stopped later. Why? It is because they realized that its nigh impossible to send a man with that technology. What they did was to just improving their film-making skills.

7. The C-Stone



One of the most controversial thing in images of moon landing gag was a rock with C-mark on it. The mark is so perfect and symmetrical that it is unlikely a natural doing. It is highly rational to think that it was marked by the film crew. However, it is a nonplus that the mark disappeared in the later images revealed by NASA.

8. The Controversial Walk


The video footage of moon landing shows Neil Armstrong walking slowly on the surface of the moon. Recent investigations proved that if the speed of the original footage is doubled, it is as same as walking on the Earth. That means, it can be done by any commoner.

9. Lack of Lunar Crater



This stands as one of the most important evidence in proving this hoax. Whenever a space shuttle lands on the moon, it should create a huge impact crater as lunar dust is just similar to that of volcanic ash. Also, the space vehicles which were launched after that, had left their lunar signatures. It is great to know if Apollo were any exception.


                    From the above, the points are crystal clear that the moon landing was manipulated. Perhaps, this might be the reason that Neil Armstrong never gave a camera interview later. It is obvious that the moon landing was faked just for political reasons and not for anything more.

0 comments: